In 2006, MSMU developed undergraduate and graduate learning goals that aligned with the mission and general education program at the Mount. The Academic Assessment Committee is responsible for assessing all of the ILOs and two LACE-specific assessments. Three assessments occur each year, with the cycle repeating every 5 years. Institutional Assessment Plan

Core Competencies

Student learning is at the core of the Mount Saint Mary’s University mission. Below you will find the results of the most current assessments of student learning measuring MSMU students’ skills in the following core competencies.

Critical Thinking (2023)

Critical Thinking was last assessed in Spring 2023 and is next scheduled for 2027. The rubric was completely revised in 2019 and 2021. Below are the results from Spring 2023 using the updated rubric.

Goal - 75% %'s proficient or higher

Identify reasoning

85% 2023

Analyze argument into parts

72% 2023

Evaluate good from bad arguments

68% 2023

Construct arguments to support your position

64% 2023

Faculty are meeting in Fall 2023 to discuss next steps to improve teaching and student learning.

 

Quantitative Reasoning (2021)

Snapshot Overview: To view the full Quantitative Reasoning Infographic, click the snapshot below.

Quantitative Reasoning Infographic Snapshot

View Quantitative Reasoning Rubric (PDF) View Quantitative Reasoning Trend Data

Quantitative Reasoning Trend Data (2011-2017)

Identify Problem

Goal - 75%
83% 2011
94% 2014
82% 2017

Determine Strategy

Goal - 75%
83% 2011
86% 2014
78% 2017

Implement Strategy

Goal - 75%
75% 2011
80% 2014
67% 2017

Reflection on Results

Goal - 75%
73% 2011
55% 2014
37% 2017

Faculty discussed the following:

  • Students performed best on understanding the problem
  • Students struggled with reflection, although some assignments did not specifically ask students to reflect
  • Results are consistent with faculty expectations
  • The downward trend occurring may be related to the assignments not being as well aligned to the rubric as past years
  • Consider having a common question for all assignments
  • Encourage students to use resources provided in class for checking the reasonableness of results
  • Have faculty model how to determine whether answers are reasonably correct
  • Discuss with students the idea of the growth mindset by introducing meta-cognitive thinking exercises

 

Information Literacy (2019)

Snapshot Overview: To view the full Information Literacy Infographic, click the snapshot below.

Information Literacy Infographic Snapshot

View Information Literacy Rubric (PDF) View Information Literacy Trend Data

Define Project, Topic, and Questions

Goal - 75%
76% 2019

Strategically Investigate Diverse Sources and Perspectives

Goal - 75%
63% 2019

Evaluate Information and Its Sources Critically

Goal - 75%
48% 2019

Incorporate Information Effectively and Ethically into New Work

Goal - 75%
52% 2019

 

Oral Communication (2022)

Oral Communication was last assessed in Spring 2022 and is next scheduled for Spring 2027. The rubric was last revised in 2021. Below are the results from Spring 2022 using the updated rubric.

Goal - 75% %'s at proficient or higher

The what

91% 2022

Arrangement of ideas

92% 2022

Vocal projection

97% 2022

Delivery

96% 2022

Pace

95% 2022

Non-Verbal communication

90% 2022

Eye contact

92% 2022

The main conclusions from this assessment are as follows (also see graph above):

  • Students exceeded the goal for all seven criteria.
  • It was surprising that students performed so well, but this made sense when considering that students were speaking to their peers and instructors which might have made them feel more comfortable.
  • Students are increasingly comfortable with presenting themselves and their voices, which might be a by-product of the prevalence of social media.

The following actions were identified:

  • Faculty can share assignment directions.
  • Continue to provide multiple opportunities for students to speak and practice speaking for diverse audiences.

Snapshot Overview: To view the full Oral Communication Infographic, click the snapshot below.

Oral Communication Overview Snapshot

 

Written Communication (2020)

Snapshot Overview: To view the full Written Communication Infographic, click the snapshot below.

Written Communication Overview Snapshot 2020

Content

Goal - 75%
31% 2011
57% 2014
63% 2015

Organization

Goal - 75%
22% 2011
65% 2014
39% 2017

Style

Goal - 75%
35% 2011
57% 2014
51% 2017

Mechanics

Goal - 75%
35% 2011
66% 2014
46% 2017

Faculty discussed the following:

  • Students appear to be having difficulty with organization, style and mechanics
  • Students need greater skills at editing and proofreading their work prior to submitting
  • Students also struggle with formulating a clear central idea (thesis), which affects organization
  • Since 2011, the overall results have improved
  • Faculty should use more formal pieces of writing for this assessment (e.g. essays)
  • Department should consider creating a separate, mandatory, college-level grammar class to be taken by all students prior to ENG 1A/B